<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parade Magazine Does It Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willtaft.com/contemporary-issues/parade-magazine-does-it-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willtaft.com/contemporary-issues/parade-magazine-does-it-again/</link>
	<description>Healthy Living For People and Planet Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://willtaft.com/contemporary-issues/parade-magazine-does-it-again/comment-page-1/#comment-9513</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 17:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willtaft.com/contemporary-issues/parade-magazine-does-it-again/#comment-9513</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know, Bob.  I am guessing that someone other than the writer chooses the photo and they don&#039;t read the article first.  They may just get an idea of the article&#039;s content from reading the title and a quick skim.

The thing is that Parade makes these kinds of editorial mistakes, but does not acknowledge them.  A few people comment on the Parade web site, but nobody from Parade responds.  The magazine does not seem to get better at avoiding mistakes like this either.  I guess they feel they are so successful, in the number one spot for circulation and advertising dollars, that they don&#039;t need to change anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, Bob.  I am guessing that someone other than the writer chooses the photo and they don&#8217;t read the article first.  They may just get an idea of the article&#8217;s content from reading the title and a quick skim.</p>
<p>The thing is that Parade makes these kinds of editorial mistakes, but does not acknowledge them.  A few people comment on the Parade web site, but nobody from Parade responds.  The magazine does not seem to get better at avoiding mistakes like this either.  I guess they feel they are so successful, in the number one spot for circulation and advertising dollars, that they don&#8217;t need to change anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://willtaft.com/contemporary-issues/parade-magazine-does-it-again/comment-page-1/#comment-9512</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 16:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willtaft.com/contemporary-issues/parade-magazine-does-it-again/#comment-9512</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s so crazy. doesn&#039;t anybody proof read this stuff?  Sending mixed messages, the words say one thing yet they say the opposite with the one thing people will not forget, the picture.

Bobs last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://blackholesandastrostuff.blogspot.com/2008/05/dominion-radio-astrophysical.html&quot;&gt;The Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s so crazy. doesn&#8217;t anybody proof read this stuff?  Sending mixed messages, the words say one thing yet they say the opposite with the one thing people will not forget, the picture.</p>
<p>Bobs last blog post..<a href="http://blackholesandastrostuff.blogspot.com/2008/05/dominion-radio-astrophysical.html">The Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
