Reader Recommendations:
Reasons to Buy Locally Produced Food

Reasons to Buy Locally Produced Food

There are many arguments for and against trying to buy your food from local sources. This article examines a few of the main issues and links to other articles

Read The Rest


Rain Harvesting Followup

by Will

rain_reduced   A few months ago I wrote about rain harvesting.  It is an idea whose time has come for certain climates and is being used more and more by homeowners and commercial businesses.  Someone emailed this week pointing out a very weird law concerning rain harvesting that at first I could not believe.  Apparently the rain is considered public property and as such it is illegal in many places to harvest it.  The idea is that the rain is supposed to flow unimpeded into rivers and lakes and to prevent that from happening is bad for the environment and the public good.

I did a little research and indeed this is true.  In fact the city of Seattle, or maybe the county Seattle is in, had to rewrite the law so that rain catching by homeowners is specifically allowed.  I found many places that ignore the law, and others that have changed it to allow rain harvesting.  Here is a blog post that goes into a bit more detail specifically on Colorado law.  Interesting and crazy angle to what I think is the great idea of rain harvesting.

Will Sig

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

techfun June 1, 2009 at 6:56 am

There was a piece on NPR’s Morning Edition today on this very topic.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104643521

You can here it there.

techfuns last blog post..Twitter Weekly Updates for 2009-05-30

Steve June 1, 2009 at 3:17 pm

Hey Will,
To my mind, the stranger or sillier the law, the more likely it is real.

Still, it does raise an interesting question. If all landowners caught the rain and didn’t allow runoff, would the rivers flow less?

But if the rain hits my lawn and soaks in, am I not preventing runoff? What is the difference between “soaking in” and being collected in a tank?
I think this law is attempting to address something that should probably be left alone. ~ Steve, the mildly confused trade show guru

Steves last blog post..The Dirty Little Secret to Designing Great Trade Show Exhibits

Will June 1, 2009 at 10:17 pm

That’s funny JD. I just read your link. I wrote the above this weekend – The NPR piece was today. Weird. In any case I recommend all to read the NPR article and the comments on it. Much more in-depth than my little rant above!

Anna June 5, 2009 at 8:28 pm

Oh wow that is new one to me. Thanks for sharing. Anna :)

Annas last blog post..A Bit of Knowledge: Chose Sharpen or Blur Tool in Photo Editing

Bob June 7, 2009 at 6:29 pm

Lol, we better check into that , like I have commented before, it is the thing to do with going green in our corporation, lots of Malls are looking into it right now.

Bobs last blog post..How To Build A Robot Army, and New NGC Premiere

Stewie June 12, 2009 at 9:04 am

Preventing the rain to flow to rivers sure is wrong, but in this concrete jungle were the rain is not going anywhere we can use this water to shower, to wash clothes and many other activities, and reduce the use of potable water for this purposes

Will June 13, 2009 at 9:53 am

Interesting point. Our concrete and asphalt jungle is preventing the rain from being absorbed into the earth. But at the same time it is putting more of it into rivers and streams. Unfortunately as it does this it takes all the oil, antifreeze, cigarette buts and other detritus with it.

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv Enabled

Previous post:

Next post: