<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drug Ads Being Pulled</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/</link>
	<description>Healthy Living For People and Planet Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:08:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lily</title>
		<link>http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-12055</link>
		<dc:creator>Lily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/#comment-12055</guid>
		<description>I’ve seen ads on TV for Caduet. It has two ingredients.  One is Amlodipine and the other is Atorvastatin.  I can get 30 tablets of Amlodipine for $9 and 30 tablets of Simvastatin for $9.  I’ll bet they are charging more than $18 for this new drug!  The unthinking public is going to pressure their doctors into giving them something just because it’s new when something old or generic would do the job for cheaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve seen ads on TV for Caduet. It has two ingredients.  One is Amlodipine and the other is Atorvastatin.  I can get 30 tablets of Amlodipine for $9 and 30 tablets of Simvastatin for $9.  I’ll bet they are charging more than $18 for this new drug!  The unthinking public is going to pressure their doctors into giving them something just because it’s new when something old or generic would do the job for cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medical Oddities</title>
		<link>http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-10304</link>
		<dc:creator>Medical Oddities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 06:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/#comment-10304</guid>
		<description>All the ads about medicines for different stuff like that is important so we know what kind of stuff is out there and people seem to get sick all the time. They shouldn&#039;t overdo it though like they do. It gets annoying seeing ads for medicines every day.

Medical Odditiess last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://medicaloddities.org/liberty-medical-supplies/&quot;&gt;Liberty Medical Supplies&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the ads about medicines for different stuff like that is important so we know what kind of stuff is out there and people seem to get sick all the time. They shouldn&#8217;t overdo it though like they do. It gets annoying seeing ads for medicines every day.</p>
<p>Medical Odditiess last blog post..<a href="http://medicaloddities.org/liberty-medical-supplies/">Liberty Medical Supplies</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-9508</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 16:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/#comment-9508</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that comment, Dan!  You make lots of great points.  DTC ads for drugs can indeed interfere with the doctor/patient relationship and put doctors in the position of having to spend a lot of time convincing patients they do not have certain diseases and do not need the advertised drugs.

But how do you reconcile this problem with the advantages to someone like the above commentator, Swubird?  His wife was obviously helped by a drug company ad.  It is a tough issue and may come down to which way provides the greater good, or does less harm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that comment, Dan!  You make lots of great points.  DTC ads for drugs can indeed interfere with the doctor/patient relationship and put doctors in the position of having to spend a lot of time convincing patients they do not have certain diseases and do not need the advertised drugs.</p>
<p>But how do you reconcile this problem with the advantages to someone like the above commentator, Swubird?  His wife was obviously helped by a drug company ad.  It is a tough issue and may come down to which way provides the greater good, or does less harm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-9506</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 02:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/#comment-9506</guid>
		<description>A Television as a Doctor?

Often, usually on television, one viewing will see an advertisement for some type of medication - usually one involved in a large market disease state and the commercial is sponsored usually by a big pharmaceutical company for a particular network.  This is called direct to consumer advertising, and doctors would prefer it did not exist.  

Since 1997, when the FDA relaxed regulations regarding this form of advertising, the popularity of the creation of such commercials has greatly increased.  The pharmaceutical industry spends around 5 billion annually on this media source now.  Normally, the creation of such a commercial becomes visible to the consumer within a year of the drug’s approval, which raises safety concerns.   And it involves money spent that could be applied to greater uses, according to many, but we are dealing with a corporation here.

The purpose of DTC ads is not education, in my opinion, as others have claimed.  Any advertising of any type shares the same objective, which is to increase sales and grow their market, in this case, for a particular perceived medical condition or disease state.  The intent of DTC advertising is to generate an emotional response from the viewer, such as fear or concern, believing upon research that the viewer will then question as to whether they need to seek treatment for what may be an unconfirmed medical condition.  

DTC advertising is also a catalyst for and similar to disease mongering.  Disease mongering is the creation of what some believe to be medical flaws, and illustrated by the creators through exaggeration and embellishments through media sources as an avenue for such propaganda, as is often seen with DTC advertising.  Yet the flaws may not be medical, but corporate creations of these questionable human ailments that do not require treatment, possibly, and may be an attempt to develop a particular medical condition to acquire profit.  One of my favorite DTCs  is the new indication for the use of an anti-depressant for a social disorder.  This used to be called introversion, a term created by Dr. Carl Yung.  And it is a personality trait, not a medical disease.  There are other questionable medical conditions claimed in the contents of DTC commercials, as the creators wish to grow the market for a particular, and possibly fictional, disease state.  Then there is baldness treatments advertised, as another example.  Lifestyle meds are not treatment meds for illnesses, and should not be portrayed as such.  

Also, DTC ads discuss only one treatment option normally, when likely several treatment options exist for authentic medical disorders.  This should be left to the discretion of the doctor, as they assess your health, not your television or another media source.  That’s why most of the world does not conduct DTC advertising, with the exception of our country and New Zealand.

Finally, DTC advertising and its ability to influence viewers to make their own assessment instead of a medical professional remains largely unregulated, yet apparently effective for the DTC creators.  People are prone to believe what they see and hear, regardless of whether or not it is actually true.  Many, after viewing a DTC ad, seek out a doctor visit and request whatever product that was advertised, which makes things cumbersome for the doctor chosen for such a visit.  So the doctor and patient relationship is altered in a negative way, because most DTC ads require a prescription.  Medical information and claims of suggested health ailments should come from those in the medical field instead of the corporate world.  Perhaps this will save some over-prescribing, which will benefit everyone in the long term.  And the Health Care System, which is far from financial prosperity, can regain control of their purpose.

“Men of ill judgment oft ignore the good that lies within their hands till they have lost it”

Sophocles

Dan Abshear</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Television as a Doctor?</p>
<p>Often, usually on television, one viewing will see an advertisement for some type of medication &#8211; usually one involved in a large market disease state and the commercial is sponsored usually by a big pharmaceutical company for a particular network.  This is called direct to consumer advertising, and doctors would prefer it did not exist.  </p>
<p>Since 1997, when the FDA relaxed regulations regarding this form of advertising, the popularity of the creation of such commercials has greatly increased.  The pharmaceutical industry spends around 5 billion annually on this media source now.  Normally, the creation of such a commercial becomes visible to the consumer within a year of the drug’s approval, which raises safety concerns.   And it involves money spent that could be applied to greater uses, according to many, but we are dealing with a corporation here.</p>
<p>The purpose of DTC ads is not education, in my opinion, as others have claimed.  Any advertising of any type shares the same objective, which is to increase sales and grow their market, in this case, for a particular perceived medical condition or disease state.  The intent of DTC advertising is to generate an emotional response from the viewer, such as fear or concern, believing upon research that the viewer will then question as to whether they need to seek treatment for what may be an unconfirmed medical condition.  </p>
<p>DTC advertising is also a catalyst for and similar to disease mongering.  Disease mongering is the creation of what some believe to be medical flaws, and illustrated by the creators through exaggeration and embellishments through media sources as an avenue for such propaganda, as is often seen with DTC advertising.  Yet the flaws may not be medical, but corporate creations of these questionable human ailments that do not require treatment, possibly, and may be an attempt to develop a particular medical condition to acquire profit.  One of my favorite DTCs  is the new indication for the use of an anti-depressant for a social disorder.  This used to be called introversion, a term created by Dr. Carl Yung.  And it is a personality trait, not a medical disease.  There are other questionable medical conditions claimed in the contents of DTC commercials, as the creators wish to grow the market for a particular, and possibly fictional, disease state.  Then there is baldness treatments advertised, as another example.  Lifestyle meds are not treatment meds for illnesses, and should not be portrayed as such.  </p>
<p>Also, DTC ads discuss only one treatment option normally, when likely several treatment options exist for authentic medical disorders.  This should be left to the discretion of the doctor, as they assess your health, not your television or another media source.  That’s why most of the world does not conduct DTC advertising, with the exception of our country and New Zealand.</p>
<p>Finally, DTC advertising and its ability to influence viewers to make their own assessment instead of a medical professional remains largely unregulated, yet apparently effective for the DTC creators.  People are prone to believe what they see and hear, regardless of whether or not it is actually true.  Many, after viewing a DTC ad, seek out a doctor visit and request whatever product that was advertised, which makes things cumbersome for the doctor chosen for such a visit.  So the doctor and patient relationship is altered in a negative way, because most DTC ads require a prescription.  Medical information and claims of suggested health ailments should come from those in the medical field instead of the corporate world.  Perhaps this will save some over-prescribing, which will benefit everyone in the long term.  And the Health Care System, which is far from financial prosperity, can regain control of their purpose.</p>
<p>“Men of ill judgment oft ignore the good that lies within their hands till they have lost it”</p>
<p>Sophocles</p>
<p>Dan Abshear</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Organic Eating Daily</title>
		<link>http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-9468</link>
		<dc:creator>Organic Eating Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/#comment-9468</guid>
		<description>I had no idea about Google not allowing hard liquor ads. Any idea on what the basis of this position is? I.E. moral versus political, or about some regulatory measures with regard to online advertising? Hmmm...

Organic Eating Dailys last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://organiceatingdaily.com/raw-foods/super-food-cacao/&quot;&gt;What Is Cacao?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no idea about Google not allowing hard liquor ads. Any idea on what the basis of this position is? I.E. moral versus political, or about some regulatory measures with regard to online advertising? Hmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>Organic Eating Dailys last blog post..<a href="http://organiceatingdaily.com/raw-foods/super-food-cacao/">What Is Cacao?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EK Abonnement</title>
		<link>http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-9467</link>
		<dc:creator>EK Abonnement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/#comment-9467</guid>
		<description>Slightly related (although not a lot...)  is Google&#039;s stance in hard liquor ads; these types of ads aren&#039;t allowed. And neither should drug ads to consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightly related (although not a lot&#8230;)  is Google&#8217;s stance in hard liquor ads; these types of ads aren&#8217;t allowed. And neither should drug ads to consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betty</title>
		<link>http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-9446</link>
		<dc:creator>Betty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 04:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/#comment-9446</guid>
		<description>I am agree that we as consumers have a right to know as much information as possible in order to make more informed choices, especially after reading comment from Swubird. I think the medical technology has been developed very fast, so it is possible that several doctors are not really up dated. Drugs advertising help both doctors and patients with important information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am agree that we as consumers have a right to know as much information as possible in order to make more informed choices, especially after reading comment from Swubird. I think the medical technology has been developed very fast, so it is possible that several doctors are not really up dated. Drugs advertising help both doctors and patients with important information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-9444</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/#comment-9444</guid>
		<description>Wow - I am glad you had a good experience and that your wife eventually got help with the new medication.  Good points all and certainly food for thought.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; I am glad you had a good experience and that your wife eventually got help with the new medication.  Good points all and certainly food for thought.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swubird</title>
		<link>http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-9442</link>
		<dc:creator>Swubird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/#comment-9442</guid>
		<description>Will:

This is a particularly interesting issue for me because my wife takes a lot of prescription drugs. She has suffered from a non-curable illness for many years, and the only thing the doctors can do is treat the symptoms to make her feel a little more comfortable. The problem is that the doctors are too busy to keep up with the latest drugs. For instance, we tracked one drug while it was used in Europe and then throughout the FDA process over here until it was finally available. We had been discussing this new drug with our doctor for some years, and we kept him updated. When It finally came out, though, we didn&#039;t know that it was actually available until three months later. That&#039;s a long time when you&#039;re in pain. We heard about it&#039;s release through drug company advertisements, so we went to our doctor and demanded to have it. He took five minutes, read about it, and then gave us a prescription. So in our case, drug advertising was helpful, and continues to help us to learn about new drugs. Other doctors we&#039;ve spoken with about new drugs we&#039;ve heard about on television, however, completely reject the idea that we should be so bold as to tell them about the new drug. In other words, if they don&#039;t find out about it through their normal process, they don&#039;t want you telling them about it. So the bottom line is that I think a bigger problem than drug advertising is the doctor&#039;s attitudes. They should get off their high horses and start thinking about what&#039;s good for the patient - no matter where the information comes from!

Swubirds last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://swubird.blogspot.com/2008/05/my-last-fight.html&quot;&gt;MY LAST FIGHT&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will:</p>
<p>This is a particularly interesting issue for me because my wife takes a lot of prescription drugs. She has suffered from a non-curable illness for many years, and the only thing the doctors can do is treat the symptoms to make her feel a little more comfortable. The problem is that the doctors are too busy to keep up with the latest drugs. For instance, we tracked one drug while it was used in Europe and then throughout the FDA process over here until it was finally available. We had been discussing this new drug with our doctor for some years, and we kept him updated. When It finally came out, though, we didn&#8217;t know that it was actually available until three months later. That&#8217;s a long time when you&#8217;re in pain. We heard about it&#8217;s release through drug company advertisements, so we went to our doctor and demanded to have it. He took five minutes, read about it, and then gave us a prescription. So in our case, drug advertising was helpful, and continues to help us to learn about new drugs. Other doctors we&#8217;ve spoken with about new drugs we&#8217;ve heard about on television, however, completely reject the idea that we should be so bold as to tell them about the new drug. In other words, if they don&#8217;t find out about it through their normal process, they don&#8217;t want you telling them about it. So the bottom line is that I think a bigger problem than drug advertising is the doctor&#8217;s attitudes. They should get off their high horses and start thinking about what&#8217;s good for the patient &#8211; no matter where the information comes from!</p>
<p>Swubirds last blog post..<a href="http://swubird.blogspot.com/2008/05/my-last-fight.html">MY LAST FIGHT</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-9436</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 02:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willtaft.com/health/drug-ads-being-pulled/#comment-9436</guid>
		<description>Yes, Sky, conflicted is a good way to put it.  Information and disclosure is great, but I am not sure ads by the drug companies qualifies as disclosure.  And , as you say it is easy to understand the concern of the doctors.

JD puts is well when he say pharmaceutical companies are being allowed direct access to consumers.  It is concerning because selling drugs directly to the consumer is very different than selling electronics, cars, or even food.  Maybe drug companies do need to be held to a hi8gher standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Sky, conflicted is a good way to put it.  Information and disclosure is great, but I am not sure ads by the drug companies qualifies as disclosure.  And , as you say it is easy to understand the concern of the doctors.</p>
<p>JD puts is well when he say pharmaceutical companies are being allowed direct access to consumers.  It is concerning because selling drugs directly to the consumer is very different than selling electronics, cars, or even food.  Maybe drug companies do need to be held to a hi8gher standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
