Labels

by

Many times I have written and commented about my perceived need for food labels that go beyond nutrition “facts”, beyond even labels like organic, to include other aspects of what some parts of the world call “Ethical Food”. Ethical Food is a concept I described in this article from August of last year, and it is something that comes up frequently in my writing here on this site, and other places. The knowledge of ethical food is highest in Great Britain, New Zealand, and Australia. Unfortunately ethical food does not seem to get much publicity in the U.S. When it does, the publicity often comes in the form of humor, not as a serious discussion of what it is and why it is so important.

Fair, clear, labeling that allows the consumer to make educated buying decisions is sorely needed in the U.S. This can be to disclose the ingredients in products. Labels can indicate adherence to requirements not only for organic food production, but could also be used for humane animal raising methods, where the food was produced, and packaged, and social issues like Fair Trade, or child labor.

I discovered recently that my concerns and desires on this issue are shared by more people than just the few of us that write about it. When random consumers are asked about the ethical and humane production of food, they almost uniformly say that it should be more available and clearly labeled. They also indicate that they would pay more for food if they could be sure it was adhering to an ethical food standard. In fact there has been a study done that asked that very question of 1,000 households. Unfortunately, like so many research studies, the entire article summarizing the study is not available to normal folk. An abstract can be found here, but to read the entire article, you must buy access from the Blackwell Synergy article database. However, it costs $40.00 for 24 hours of access to the article, so it is unavailable to most of us. I don’t know if this particular study was done with even a small amount of government support. But, if the research was done with any tax money at all, I believe it should be freely available for all of us to read.

In any case, it is good to know that when asked, almost everyone supports not only the production of ethical food, but the clear, regulated, labeling of food produced ethically. Maybe the U.S. can now begin to catch up to some of the European and Down Under countries on this issue. If this is to happen, we need to have wider coverage. The article referred to above is not new, it was published in September of 2006. I don’t remember any main-stream news media coverage of it. If the only discussion of ethical food is taking place on small websites like this one, progress will be slow, at best.

So, if the idea of ethical food seems reasonable to you, shout it from the rooftops. Do your best to buy ethically raised food whenever you have that choice. Find websites talking about ethical food and humanely raised farm animals and submit those urls to Digg, Stumbleupon, or other sites whee the issue will be discussed.   Publicize this in any way you can. If you write or have a blog yourself, even if your normal area of interest is far removed from this issue, you can help. Write a short post including links to posts like this. Spread the word in whatever small way you can. It will make a difference.

A few more links:

A UK Market Research Report on Ethical Food.

Grow or Purchase More Local Ethical Food

A UK Local. Ethical Food Locator

It's only fair to share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Will Sig
1 Andrew Flusche

Food labeling is a crazy mess of issues. I studied the FDA a bit in law school, and the current labeling requirements are a nutty mess.

I’m not convinced that more labeling requirements is the way to go. Maybe that would provide more consumer information, but do people really know what all the label info means now? And wouldn’t more info likely just be information overload?

Andrew Flusches last blog post..GPS Defense Fails in Traffic Court

Reply

2 Will

I think you are right that more labeling is not the answer if it is more of the current “nutty” labeling. But if beef is cloned, I believe that should be required on the label. And there are any number of other disclosures I think should be required.

The whole idea that we only need to know if something has been done to or is in our food when it has been proven that the “something” causes harm is ludicrous.

Reply

3 Bob

Like Andrew said the labeling requirements are messed up, my wife likes to read labels, one of the reasons I like to go by myself for groceries, and she is quite confused and has noted no uniformity whatsoever, having said that if there was more of a clear and concise method, the ethical food area is one I’d be very interested in, it would definitely make the purchase a more informed one. Thanks for the link for the ethical and humane production of food study, I would have gone to the original but 40 dollars is nuts.

Bobs last blog post..Martian Water Confirmed and Total Solar Eclipse

Reply

4 Shanavas

I like reading labels on the container. At least we know what we are eating. But you will not a complete idea what it is since some of them will be just listed as just colour and we don’t know what they people are using.

Reply

Cancel reply

Thank you for your comments

CommentLuv badge
My full comment policy is linked here, but please do not use a keyword as your name. For great referrrals and backlinks, link to your site in the box and by using CommentLuv

Previous post:

Next post: