Reader Recommendations:
Will Earth Survive? One Humble Opinion

Will Earth Survive? One Humble Opinion

This post is one of the most read here at WillTaft.com. Will earth survive? Will humans survive? Add your opinion to the comments section!

Read The Rest

We Are Not Crazy - Plastic Is a Problem!

We Are Not Crazy - Plastic Is a Problem!

Despite the occasional email I get saying I am wrong, chemicals in plastics and in other consumer products are something to be concerned about. Our exposures a

Read The Rest

Are Local Food Sources Better?

Are Local Food Sources Better?

Why is the debate over the importance of buying food locally always dominated by the issue of miles traveled to get to your fork? This is a bit of a red herrin

Read The Rest

Our Food and Climate Change

Our Food and Climate Change

Last September, Slow Food Nation hosted a great panel discussion on the World's food supply and how it will be impacted by the climate change that is already s

Read The Rest

Did You Know? The Albatross and the Bottle Cap

Did You Know? The Albatross and the Bottle Cap

Beautiful but sad story and photos of Albatross chicks in the remote Pacific.

Read The Rest


Ethical Recycling

by Will on June 9, 2008

  Because I am so interested in promoting the concept of Ethical Food here in the U.S., I monitor news stories for use of the term. Ninety percent of what I see is from the U.K., most of the rest is from other European countries or Australia and New Zealand. There is almost never a mention of Ethical Food in the U.S. media. If there is one, it is more often than not a result from this website.

This morning I noticed the phrase "ethical recycling" in one of the stories that I had found. I also noticed that the company using the term was from the U.S. Taking a look, I was surprised to learn that learn that the phrase ethical recycling had no green connotations at all. Basically what it meant is that this company has new technology that will destroy and recycle documents or books without any human involvement. This eliminates privacy and unethical resale concerns people have about shipping their content off for recycling. I guess this is sort of like a huge version of the paper shredder you have in your home or office.

In the first three months of this year the company destroyed more that 4.2 million pounds of books, catalogs, corporate reports, and other bound and unbound documents. Somehow they are able to grind up the entire product, regardless of whether it includes content like CD’s, metal or plastic binding, or plastic page inserts. They claim that after the destruction process, 100% is recycled, nothing goes to the landfill. They do not indicate how or into what the resulting material is recycled.

Still, this is apparently great progress as other document destruction companies have to use humans to separate out the original material into categories. Then everything other than the paper content goes to the landfill. I had no idea document destruction was such a huge industry. There is even an organization called "The National Association for Information Destruction", that has its own code of ethics. It is interesting to see that the marketing of these services is now including the fact that all of the material can be recycled. Sometimes progress comes in areas you did not even know existed.

Will Sig

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

chaosgone June 10, 2008 at 1:06 pm

It is a good idea. By allowing privacy, more people will probably recycle paper that they are too busy to shred themselves.

chaosgones last blog post..Space Cadets

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv Enabled

Previous post:

Next post:

SutmbleUponWillTaft on Facebookwt@willtaft.com